CJCC System Mapping Subcommittee

  • Printer-friendly version
Calendar Date:
Tuesday, May 26, 2015 - 2:00pm

Add to your calendar:  

Back to calendar

Meeting Information

  • Agenda
  • Minutes
PDF icon Agenda (80 KB)

REASON FOR MEETING:                                         REGULAR

SUBJECTS FOR DISCUSSION:

1.  Call to Order and Certify Compliance with Open Meeting Law.
2.  Adopt agenda.
3.  Approval of minutes from prior meeting.
4.  Public Comment. (Three minute limit per person). 
5.  Communications.
6.  COMPAS – Where it fits into the system as a resource.
7.  System Mapping

       a.  Law Enforcement Agencies

             i.   Who are we arresting and why?
             ii.   Are we arresting the right people?
             iii.  What evidence supports the intended outcome of the arrest?

8.  Next Steps

       a.  Create the next system mapping agenda

9.  Next meeting date and agenda items.
10.  Public Comment.
11.  Adjourn.

     *TO:

County Clerk

Orth

Bindl

Schauf

Lange

Krueger

Kuhlmann

Wenzel

Dept. Heads

Calkins

Strunz

DATE NOTICE MAILED: Wednesday, May 06, 2015

PREPARED BY: J. Krueger, Criminal Justice Coordinator

PDF icon Minutes (154 KB)

Members present:     Annette Kuhlmann, Kevin Calkins, Chief Jerry Strunz, Jeff Bindl, and Marty Krueger

Members absent:       Bill Orth, Bill Wenzel, and Raymond Laatsch

Others Present:       

 

The meeting was called to order and certification of Open Meeting compliance was given at 2:10 P.M. Motion by Bindl, second by Calkins to adopt agenda. Motion carried.

 

Motion by Calkins, second by Krueger, to approve the minutes of the prior meeting.  Motion carried.

Public Comment: None

 

Communications: J. Krueger reports that three members of the subcommittee made contact to inform of their absence.

COMPAS:  There is discussion on COMPAS and where it fits into the system as an evidence- based tool that will assist in decision making.  Further research will be done on using COMPAS to inform bail/bond decisions, sentencing decisions, and possibly incorporating it into the decision making process for electronic monitoring.

Law Enforcement Agencies:  Initial inquiries into who is being arrested and why result in discussion of how different agencies handle similar situations.  There is an overall consensus that violent offenders are being arrested; however, outside of statutorily required arrests the decisions are based largely on officer discretion and agency discretion.

One similarity across the departments is that there is no risk tool being used to help aid in the decision making process.  There is discussion about further review and research on the Hawaiian Proxy to pre-screen offenders for risk of reoffending during the arrest decision making process.

This tool and more research will be provided for the team’s review at the next meeting and J. Krueger will attempt to arrange a presentation in August by a community who uses this tool to screen prior to arrest decisions being made.

Next meeting and agenda items:

Hawaiian Proxy
Review Jail Data
August Presentation
What agency should be evaluated next?

Date and Time:           July 13, 2015              2:00 PM        

Agenda items:           

Motion was approved to adjourn the meeting by Calkins, second by Strunz.

 

Respectfully submitted;

 

Janelle K. Krueger

Criminal Justice Coordinator